For the Presidential Scholarship at Creighton University, I ahd to write an essay about who I was, and then an essay on a controversial issue. Immediately, I thought back to our time spent going over drilling in ANWR.
Please keep in mind, I had a maximum word limit of 450 words. It was rather frustrating.
—–
Write an essay of 350-450 words on an intellectual topic or controversial current event and submit it with this
application. Your essay should clearly state and support a position on the topic you have chosen; however, you will
not be evaluated on which position you take, but on the quality of your argument and the way in which you present it.
The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge(ANWR) is home to over two hundred species of fish, birds and mammals that can’t be found anywhere else. It also houses some ten billion barrels of oil–oil that can be used to fuel our lifestyle. The proposed drilling area is two thousand acres of the 1002 Area, where over seven of the estimated ten billion barrels are.
Some people are in favor of drilling in ANWR. They say, and rightly so, that drilling at home will lessen our dependence on foreign oil. Furthermore, jobs would be created in the process, stimulating the economy. Furthermore, the technology used to drill for oil is being constantly improved, and the scars that drilling leaves behind are growing smaller all the time.
Those who oppose drilling, however, have their own valid reasons. There’s a significant possibility that there’s much less than seven billion barrels within Area 1002. Even with the maximum amount of production, America’s current rate of consumption means that the oil produced would last only about six months. The price of gas at the pump, too, wouldn’t drop more than a few cents. Also, we can speculate all we want about the impact our actions will have on the environment, but we won’t know for sure until we drill–and then, it would be impossible to undo any damage. This damage could very easily include oil spills.
I don’t think the benefits of drilling justify the potential damage to the wildlife in ANWR. The inescapable damage caused by drilling can utterly devastate Alaska’s fragile, carefully balanced ecosystem. After all, the Prince William Sound still hasn’t wholly recovered from the Exxon Valdez spill twenty years ago. Oil still covers the beaches and poisons the fish and anything that eats them. What’s to stop another devastating spill from happening if ANWR were opened up?
Besides, we’re taking a simplistic approach to the whole issue. There are other alternatives available to us, so we can save the wildlife and still live our lives as usual. There are already-built oil production sites that are closed; we can open them, and get oil from there. To reduce our need in the first place, we can buy fuel-efficient cars. By bringing efficiency requirements of vehicles to thirty-five miles per gallon, we save over one million barrels of oil a day–over half of what we import from the Persian Gulf every day. On top of that, we save the environment as well.
We shouldn’t drill in ANWR. But that doesn’t mean we have to drastically change the way we live.